<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earglasses*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sampablokuper.com/2008/06/10/earglasses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sampablokuper.com/2008/06/10/earglasses/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sampablokuper</title>
		<link>http://www.sampablokuper.com/2008/06/10/earglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>sampablokuper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sampablokuper.com/blog/?p=16#comment-9</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Mel - sorry I couldn&#039;t find it first time round. I&#039;ve linked it now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Want to mention it on earfilter.org? That would also help me find out if everything is working as it should on there. Among other things, I&#039;m not sure how &quot;locked down&quot; the site should be. Because I don&#039;t have a team of bot-wielding spam fighters at my disposal, I&#039;m inclined to require registration for editing, and I&#039;ve enabled reCAPTCHA, but I&#039;m no MediaWiki guru so I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s working as planned yet. If you have a mo, please let me know :) x spk&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mel &#8211; sorry I couldn&#8217;t find it first time round. I&#8217;ve linked it now.</p>

<p>Want to mention it on earfilter.org? That would also help me find out if everything is working as it should on there. Among other things, I&#8217;m not sure how &#8220;locked down&#8221; the site should be. Because I don&#8217;t have a team of bot-wielding spam fighters at my disposal, I&#8217;m inclined to require registration for editing, and I&#8217;ve enabled reCAPTCHA, but I&#8217;m no MediaWiki guru so I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s working as planned yet. If you have a mo, please let me know <img src='http://www.sampablokuper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  x spk</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://www.sampablokuper.com/2008/06/10/earglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sampablokuper.com/blog/?p=16#comment-10</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Sam. :) &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.melchua.com/2007/01/28/what-it-looks-like-to-hear-like-mel/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; a rough picture of my audiogram, in case it helps.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Sam. <img src='http://www.sampablokuper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  <a href="http://blog.melchua.com/2007/01/28/what-it-looks-like-to-hear-like-mel/" rel="nofollow">here&#8217;s</a> a rough picture of my audiogram, in case it helps.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sampablokuper</title>
		<link>http://www.sampablokuper.com/2008/06/10/earglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>sampablokuper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sampablokuper.com/blog/?p=16#comment-8</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was thinking, &quot;If there are already lots of portable audio processors around, why do we need create another one?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Essentially it comes down to two things: the choice of algorithms that is available, and the input connections. Most of the portable audio processors I&#039;ve seen either have microphone or guitar (Hi-Z) inputs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s take the Korg Pandora as our example. In this case, the input is mono, and Hi-Z. The best we&#039;d be able to do with this would be to add an impedance matcher to the input and short in the live signals of both channels of our hi-fi&#039;s line-level output. This would give us a clean enough mono signal, but it would destroy the stereo image of the source recording. For a first attempt at an earfilter hardware device, that might not matter, but then consider the algorithms available. I expect we&#039;d need at least a four-band dynamics processor and a six-band parametric EQ in order to get useful results, and the Pandora, if I&#039;m not mistaken, features neither of these.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If we find a portable device with a stereo line input that&#039;s capable of running those algorithms, then maybe we need do nothing further. But I don&#039;t know of any such device yet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, the earfilter might be able to function as an open-source Pandora, with the simple addition of an impedance-matching mono input and a few good free amp-sim &amp; FX plugins.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking, &#8220;If there are already lots of portable audio processors around, why do we need create another one?&#8221;</p>

<p>Essentially it comes down to two things: the choice of algorithms that is available, and the input connections. Most of the portable audio processors I&#8217;ve seen either have microphone or guitar (Hi-Z) inputs.</p>

<p>Let&#8217;s take the Korg Pandora as our example. In this case, the input is mono, and Hi-Z. The best we&#8217;d be able to do with this would be to add an impedance matcher to the input and short in the live signals of both channels of our hi-fi&#8217;s line-level output. This would give us a clean enough mono signal, but it would destroy the stereo image of the source recording. For a first attempt at an earfilter hardware device, that might not matter, but then consider the algorithms available. I expect we&#8217;d need at least a four-band dynamics processor and a six-band parametric EQ in order to get useful results, and the Pandora, if I&#8217;m not mistaken, features neither of these.</p>

<p>If we find a portable device with a stereo line input that&#8217;s capable of running those algorithms, then maybe we need do nothing further. But I don&#8217;t know of any such device yet.</p>

<p>On the other hand, the earfilter might be able to function as an open-source Pandora, with the simple addition of an impedance-matching mono input and a few good free amp-sim &amp; FX plugins.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
